皇冠搏彩APP下载 & 皇冠线上买球平台 attorneys frequently advocate for clients in the resolution of construction and other types of disputes by mediation, arbitration and other forms of alternate dispute resolution, in addition to our litigation practice.
Our attorneys represent business owners, 承包商, 分包商, 材料供应商, 架构师, 工程师, and other parties with respect to disputes arising under construction and commercial contracts. We are often engaged to handle disputes involving technical issues and requiring the knowledge of a client’s specific business that our attorneys' possess.
We serve as arbitrators and mediators resolving complex construction and contract disputes. In our role as mediators and arbitrators, we serve as a neutral party to facilitate an agreement of the parties through dispute resolution. 当我们充当调解人的时候, we do not make a decisions regarding a dispute but only assist the parties in reaching a resolution. On the other hand, when we serve as arbitrators, we are empowered to make a final binding decision. In addition to acting as an advocate for parties in a dispute, 皇冠搏彩APP下载 & 皇冠线上买球平台's attorneys have the training, knowledge of rules which govern mediation and arbitration, and experience to handle large complex construction and commercial contract disputes.
尽管中介, arbitration and other forms of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) are not intended to replace the use of litigation to resolve disputes, 在某些类型的纠纷中, ADR can be a more cost effective and more expeditious way to achieve resolution. In disputes arising under construction and other types of contracts, often mediation or arbitration may be a mandatory requirement of the contract. Some courts have the power to order litigants to attempt to resolve disputes by mediation.
皇冠搏彩APP下载律师事务所 & 皇冠线上买球平台 have over 50 years' combined experience in handling mediation and arbitration of large complex cases, 还有更小的箱子. We are proud to provide legal services to clients at a reasonable cost. Our attorneys are strong advocates of mediation and arbitration as a way to avoid costly litigation.
承包商的4美元.3 million claim for added costs due to 不同的场地条件, delays and design defects in construction of federal office building.
Mechanical contractor’s claim of approximately $2 million due to defective design and lack of coordination between the structural and mechanical design of a performing arts center.
Claims of two 分包商 on highway project for delays, breach of implied warranty of access to jobsite, 不同的场地条件, and payment for owned equipment costs.
Claim of city against contractor for billing irregularities and other breaches of contract and defense of contractor’s claim against city for delays and extra work resulting in recovery by city of approximately $1.900万来自承包商.
City’s claim against contractor for defective construction of a bridge involving approximately $3.500万重建桥梁.
Claim of third party against subcontractor in suit brought by university against contractor for cost of $1.2 million to remove and replace defective precast stairs in new dormitory.
索赔约1美元.1 million asserted by a condominium association against contractor for the cost of removing and replacing the artificial stucco on the exterior of the buildings.